• 4. Preis

    INGENIEURBÜRO DR. BINNEWIES Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg (DE) Büroprofil

    In Zusammenarbeit mit:
    Architekten: Riegler Riewe Architekten ZT-GmbH, Graz (AT), Berlin (DE)
    Architekten: Marina Stankovic Architekten BDA, Berlin (DE)
    Architekten: yo2 architects Ltd., Seoul (KR)
    Bauingenieure: Amstein + Walthert AG, Zürich (CH)
    Landschaftsarchitekten: Agence Ter, Karlsruhe (DE), Paris (FR), Barcelona (ES)
    Energieplaner: Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH, Stuttgart (DE), München (DE), New York, NY (US), Paris (FR)
    Verkehrsplaner: ARGUS Stadt- und Verkehrsplanung, Hamburg (DE)

    Liegt nicht vor.

    Beurteilung durch das Preisgericht

    Applying the criteria of the RFP, the jury appreciated the project for the following qualities:
    Strong master plan qualities, potentially providing a system for great variety, a small town.
    Strong phasing concept.
    Strong sense of the landscape through the site with the ‘creek’.
    Applying the criteria of the RFP, the following components of the project have been judged as less successful by the jury:
    Lacking potential to create an image as a neighborhood.
    Too wide distribution of student accommodation.
    Sport facilities too remote from main student housing.
    Missing statement on the areas north of the canal.
    Little sense of orientation or local context.
    Applying the criteria of the RFP, the jury has doubts in regard of the following parts of the design, resulting in the recommendation to review these elements in case the authors are chosen for further development:
    The tall housing blocks seemed out of scale and not appropriate. It was felt that increasing the heights and density of the lower student housing would allow for more density, without the need for the taller towers.