GB-G2 5JF Glasgow
30.01.2017
Ausschreibung
(ID 2-250674)

Design Technical and Professional Services Framework

Projektdaten

Bewerbungsschluss	30.01.2017, 10:00
Verfahren	Nicht offenes Verfahren
Teilnehmer	Gewünschte Teilnehmerzahl: min. 10 - max. 10
Gebäudetyp	Verkehr
Art der Leistung	Bauleistung / Objektplanung Gebäude / Objektplanung Innenräume / allgemeine Beratungsleistungen / Objektplanung Verkehrsanlagen / Schallschutz, Raumakustik / Projektsteuerung / Energieplanung/ -beratung / Thermische Bauphysik / Technische Ausrüstung / Sicherheits-/ Gesundheitsschutz / Kostenmanagement / Bodenmechanik, Erd-/ Grundbau / Stadt-/ Gebietsplanung / Objektplanung Freianlagen
Sprache	Englisch
Aufgabe	Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) is seeking to renew and update their existing Design, Technical and Professional Services Framework which will be utilised to assist SPT in the delivery of projects across a number of its business streams. The Framework will consist of the following Lots: 1 Transport Planning Consultancy Support 2 Transport Modelling Consultancy Support 3 Academic Support 4 Land Use Planning Consultancy 5 Quality Management and Safety Management Systems Certification and Approval 6 Architectural Services 7 Civil and Structural Engineering 8 Mechanical and Electrical Engineering 9 Signalling Telecoms and Control Systems 10 Energy Management and Environmental Engineering 11 Rail Engineering 12 Asset Management Engineering 13 Property Services 14 Project Office Support 15 Specialist Consultancy Support for all operational and Maintenance system improvements.
Leistungsumfang	This Brief is for the provision of multi-disciplinary support for the on-going programme of Subway Modernisation. The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Subway Modernisation Support requirements. Independent Expertise on Existing System Inclusive of integration and migration of the existing system through the implementation of new rolling stock, signalling and control systems. Independent Expertise on New Trains, Signalling and Control Systems Independent Expertise on Innovative Approaches to Operations and Maintenance Specialist Support in Implementation of New Operating and Maintenance Systems and Supporting Processes (The services to be provided under this sub lot will focus on implementing a programme of improvement in maintenance systems and supporting processes in the subway).
Adresse des Bauherren	UK-G2 5JF Glasgow
TED Dokumenten-Nr.	437493-2016

Anzeigentext Ausschreibung
- United Kingdom-Glasgow: Civil engineering consultancy services
  
  2016/S 240-437493
  
  Contract notice
  
  Services
  
  Directive 2014/24/EU
  
  Section I: Contracting authority
  
  I.1)Name and addresses
  Strathclyde Partnership for Transport
  131 St Vincent Street
  Glasgow
  G2 5JF
  United Kingdom
  Telephone: +44 1413333556
  E-mail: MjIwXF5bT2FeUVlRWmAsX1xgGk9bGmFX
  Fax: +44 1413333224
  NUTS code: UKM34
  Internet address(es):
  
  Main address: www.spt.co.uk
  
  Address of the buyer profile: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/Search_AuthProfile.aspx?ID=AA10382
  
  I.2)Joint procurement
  
  I.3)Communication
  The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at: https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk
  
  Additional information can be obtained from the abovementioned address
  
  Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted electronically via: https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk
  
  I.4)Type of the contracting authority
  Regional or local authority
  
  I.5)Main activity
  Other activity: transport
  
  Section II: Object
  
  II.1)Scope of the procurement
  
  II.1.1)Title:
  
  Design Technical and Professional Services Framework.
  
  Reference number: 16-001
  
  II.1.2)Main CPV code
  71311000
  
  II.1.3)Type of contract
  Services
  
  II.1.4)Short description:
  
  Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) is seeking to renew and update their existing Design, Technical and Professional Services Framework which will be utilised to assist SPT in the delivery of projects across a number of its business streams.
  
  The Framework will consist of the following Lots:
  
  1 Transport Planning Consultancy Support
  
  2 Transport Modelling Consultancy Support
  
  3 Academic Support
  
  4 Land Use Planning Consultancy
  
  5 Quality Management and Safety Management Systems Certification and Approval
  
  6 Architectural Services
  
  7 Civil and Structural Engineering
  
  8 Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
  
  9 Signalling Telecoms and Control Systems
  
  10 Energy Management and Environmental Engineering
  
  11 Rail Engineering
  
  12 Asset Management Engineering
  
  13 Property Services
  
  14 Project Office Support
  
  15 Specialist Consultancy Support for all operational and Maintenance system improvements.
  
  II.1.5)Estimated total value
  Value excluding VAT: 6 000 000.00 GBP
  
  II.1.6)Information about lots
  This contract is divided into lots: yes
  
  Tenders may be submitted for all lots
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Transport Planning Consultancy Support
  
  Lot No: 1
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71311210
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM
  
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  Scotland Wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is to cover transport planning for all modes of transport (including freight, cycling and walking)
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our transport planning needs:
  
  Transport Planning;
  
  Transport Planning Policy;
  
  Town Planning;
  
  Timetable planning and modelling;
  
  Strategy Development/Strategic Project Assessment
  
  European policy/funding;
  
  Policy development;
  
  Appraisal / Feasibility/Research and Analysis;
  
  General Surveys;
  
  Claims Advice (Loss and Expenses);
  
  Electronic Information, CCTV, GPS, Maps, Software etc.;
  
  Analysis and monitoring e.g. noise, air quality, visual intrusion;
  
  Sustainable Development;
  
  Environmental Assessments and Monitoring;
  
  Ecology and Biodiversity studies.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the Consultant Will Deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  At the sole discretion of SPT this framework will be extended by 12 months.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Part 1 Selection: Qualification Stage inclusive of Technical Envelope.
  
  This is scored and failure to provide all information requested or a satisfactory explanation as to why it has not been provided may result in your exclusion from the procurement process.
  
  The Mandatory ESPD questions will be scored as pass/fail
  
  Technical Envelope questions are based on Capability and Experience as follows:
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Transport Modelling Consultancy Support
  
  Lot No: 2
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71311200
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is to cover transport planning for all modes of transport (including freight, cycling and walking)
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our transport modeling needs.
  
  Transport modelling and surveys (strategic and scheme specific) covering all modes of transport including freight, cycling and walking;
  
  Appraisal / Feasibility
  
  Railway (and any other form of transport) Model Simulation;
  
  Passenger Flow Models;
  
  Traffic Management and Demand Analysis;
  
  Risk Management;
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the Consultant Will Deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will extended for 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Academic Support
  
  Lot No: 3
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71311200
  
  71311210
  
  71311300
  
  71312000
  
  71313000
  
  71313100
  
  71313200
  
  71314300
  
  71315100
  
  71315200
  
  71315210
  
  71351200
  
  71351220
  
  71600000
  
  71621000
  
  90713000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This lot is for all SPT's academic support requirements. and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our academic support needs.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the Consultant will Deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  A 12 month extension to this contract will be granted at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Land Use Planning Consultancy
  
  Lot No: 4
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71410000
  
  90712100
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is to cover land use planning consultancy.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our land use planning needs.
  
  Town planning
  
  Planning Consultancy Advice for Inquiries, responses to Development Plans, Applications & Consultations
  
  Representation at Inquiries;
  
  Planning Legislation Advice and Approvals;
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the Consultant will Deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Quality Management and Safety Management Systems Certification and Approval
  
  Lot No: 5
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  72225000
  
  72224200
  
  71317210
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  The services required for this lot are expected to be, but not limited to the provision of Work place and public safety support; occupational survey and investigation audit, certification for ISO standards, client CDM advisor or Principal Designer services to assist SPT in the delivery of SPT projects ensuring compliance with current Construction, Design and Management regulations and in line with the present and any future changes to the regulations and/or legislation. this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Quality Management and Safety Management Systems Certification and Approval requirements.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Staff / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the Consultant will Deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  There will be 12 month extension of this framework at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Architectural Services
  
  Lot No: 6
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71220000
  
  71221000
  
  71223000
  
  71230000
  
  71240000
  
  71250000
  
  71400000
  
  71420000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This Brief is for the provision of Architectural consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects which require an architectural input.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Architectural services:
  
  Architecture;
  
  Conservation;
  
  Historic Structure Refurbishment;
  
  Landscaping;
  
  Space Planning & Modelling;
  
  Site Supervision and Clerk of Works;
  
  Access/Disability Design and Audits;
  
  Building Surveying;
  
  Site Supervision.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver ( / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the soled discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Civil and Structural Engineering Services
  
  Lot No: 7
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71311000
  
  71311100
  
  71312000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of Civil Engineering consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects which require a civil and structural engineering input.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Architectural services:
  
  Civil Engineering
  
  Structural Engineering;
  
  Permanent Way Design (Ballasted and Concrete Trackbed);
  
  Tunnelling including Refurbishment and Maintenance;
  
  Building Refurbishment;
  
  Drainage Design and Water and Waste Water Engineering;
  
  Geotechnical Engineering
  
  Roads, Highways, Bridges and Infrastructure Engineering;
  
  Specialised Transport Engineering Services for Bus Train Station Development;
  
  Cycle way Design;
  
  Pedestrian Way Design;
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement ( / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  There will a 12-month extension to this framework at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
  
  Lot No: 8
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  45351000
  
  45315100
  
  71300000
  
  71314310
  
  71321000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects across a range of mechanical and electrical railway assets and any other assets across the SPT estate, at all stages of the product lifecycle from specification to testing to operation and maintenance to disposal.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Mechanical and Electrical Engineering requirements. :
  
  Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Design
  
  Heating/Energy System and Lighting Design;
  
  Analysis, Simulation, Testing and Modelling;
  
  Safety, Reliability and Performance Improvement;
  
  Failure Root Cause analysis;
  
  Reverse Engineering (for specification determination);
  
  Cost-estimating including whole life estimates;
  
  Obsolescence management.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This contract will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Signalling Telecoms and Control Systems
  
  Lot No: 9
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  34632200
  
  45234115
  
  45316000
  
  45316200
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  Glasgow.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of Signalling, Telecoms and Control Systems consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects which require an electronic and systems engineering input.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Signalling Telecoms and Control Systems requirements:
  
  Railway signalling systems;
  
  Telecommunications;
  
  Control systems (wayside, centralised and train borne control systems);
  
  Automatic Train Operation, Automatic Train Protection and Automatic Train Control systems (ATO, ATP and ATC);
  
  Software Engineering and Design;
  
  Radio communication systems.
  
  Fibre Optic/WIFI Communication Systems.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Energy Management and Environmental Engineering
  
  Lot No: 10
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71314200
  
  71314300
  
  71313000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of Energy management and environmental consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of carbon reduction, energy efficiency and environmental protection initiatives.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Energy Management and Environmental Engineering requirements:
  
  Renewable Energy Application and Design
  
  Environmental impact assessment;
  
  Expert Policy Guidance on Water Management (waste and potable) and Licensing;
  
  Expert policy and guidance on waste management and recycling
  
  Expert policy and guidance on noise assessment and reduction
  
  Environmental and Occupational investigations, Sampling analysis and Interpretation;
  
  Energy management and energy efficiency
  
  Carbon footprint reduction and low carbon technologies.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Rail Engineering
  
  Lot No: 11
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71311230
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  Glasgow.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of Rail Engineering consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects which require railway industry expertise and experience.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Rail Engineering consultancy requirement:
  
  Railway engineering systems design including rolling stock, battery powered locomotives, 3rd rail high voltage traction power supply and distribution, signalling and control systems, ATO and permanent way
  
  Railway engineering systems maintenance planning and optimisation
  
  Railway engineering systems operation policy and procedures
  
  Railway systems legislation, standards and compliance.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Asset Management Engineering
  
  Lot No: 12
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71300000
  
  71320000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  Glasgow.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This brief is for the provision of asset management consultancy services to assist SPT in the delivery of projects which require asset management, maintenance and life cycle planning and management of engineering information/data.
  
  Asset Management Engineering:
  
  Expertise in designing and implementing asset management systems
  
  Design, configuration and use of Enterprise Asset Management software systems
  
  Implementation of ISO 55000 management systems
  
  Design and implementation of condition based and risk-based maintenance programmes
  
  Engineering information systems reporting for KPIs and business continuous improvement
  
  Asset life cycle cost analysis and prediction
  
  Maintenance optimisation.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Property Services
  
  Lot No: 13
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  70332000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This Brief is for the provision of Property services to assist SPT in the delivery of Estate Management services including professional advice, guidance, negotiation and assistance on property and estate issues.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Property Services requirements:
  
  Rent Reviews;
  
  Lease breaks and lease expiries;
  
  Lease renewals;
  
  Dilapidations and property life cycle costing;
  
  Landlord and tenant issues including Landlord consents, service charge and claims;
  
  Rating — to provide a full range of rating support services;
  
  Strategic advice, including the preparation and development of an estate strategy;
  
  Procurement strategy for property related issues;
  
  Development consultancy and advice;
  
  Valuations including acquisition and disposal of property interests;
  
  Planning;
  
  Condition surveys;
  
  Service assurance;
  
  Compulsory purchase;
  
  Wayleaves and easements;
  
  Other neighbourly matters;
  
  General advice on estate and property management;
  
  Facilities Management;
  
  Contract and tender preparation related to Facilities Management/Property management;
  
  Property capital and revenue project management;Structural and building surveying including instructive survey investigations;
  
  Letting and marketing advice;
  
  Valuations for statutory account purposes including DRC valuations.
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality and Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Project Office Support
  
  Lot No: 14
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  72224000
  
  71324000
  
  79994000
  
  48311100
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM3
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  May be Scotland wide.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This Brief is for the provision of multi-disciplinary Office Support Services.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Project Office Support requirements.
  
  Quantity Surveying / Cost Consultancy
  
  Contract Administration
  
  Planning/Project Controls
  
  Document Controls (including SharePoint)
  
  Risk Management
  
  Project Management (multi-disciplinary).
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended by 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  II.2)Description
  
  II.2.1)Title:
  
  Specialist Consultancy Support for all operational and Maintenance system improvements
  
  Lot No: 15
  
  II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
  71300000
  
  71336000
  
  II.2.3)Place of performance
  NUTS code: UKM34
  
  Main site or place of performance:
  
  Glasgow.
  
  II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
  
  This Brief is for the provision of multi-disciplinary support for the on-going programme of Subway Modernisation.
  
  The generic areas of this lot are listed below. In future we may call off services which are linked to this list, but the list is not exhaustive and we may utilise this framework for any for all or any of our Subway Modernisation Support requirements.
  
  Independent Expertise on Existing System Inclusive of integration and migration of the existing system through the implementation of new rolling stock, signalling and control systems.
  
  Independent Expertise on New Trains, Signalling and Control Systems
  
  Independent Expertise on Innovative Approaches to Operations and Maintenance
  
  Specialist Support in Implementation of New Operating and Maintenance Systems and Supporting Processes (The services to be provided under this sub lot will focus on implementing a programme of improvement in maintenance systems and supporting processes in the subway).
  
  II.2.5)Award criteria
  Criteria below
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Expertise and Understanding of Requirement / Weighting: 15 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Methodology and Work Plan / Weighting: 25 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Quality & Resilience of Personnel / Weighting: 20 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: How the consultant will deliver / Weighting: 30 %
  
  Quality criterion - Name: Risk and Mitigation and Opportunity / Weighting: 10 %
  
  Price - Weighting: 40 %
  
  II.2.6)Estimated value
  
  II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
  Duration in months: 36
  
  This contract is subject to renewal: yes
  
  Description of renewals:
  
  This framework will be extended for 12 months at the sole discretion of SPT.
  
  II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
  Envisaged number of candidates: 10
  
  Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
  
  Stage One will be a qualification stage and will be evaluated by the responses laid out in your ESPD response as follows:
  
  a. Qualification Envelope: This requires to be completed only once regardless of the number of lots you wish to submit a bid for and contains standard ESPD questions.
  
  b. Technical Envelopes: The technical envelope contains procurement specific questions based on your background and capabilities. These questions are scored. Tenderers must submit a technical envelop response for each of the lots they intend to submit a bid for.
  
  Failure to meet the above requirements will result in your submission being set aside.
  
  Technical Envelope Questions
  
  Each element of each question will be individual scored on ratings between 0 — 4. The total number of points available in this section is 4 per question multiplied by the weighting as detailed in below.
  
  T1 Provide references of where your organisation has been part of a successful public sector framework (this may have been as a sub-contractor) in the past 5 years, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Size of the Framework
  
  Total value of the framework
  
  Length of the framework
  
  If the framework suppliers were ranked, what was your position
  
  Number of commissions your organisation was awarded
  
  Total value of commissions awarded to your organisation
  
  T2 Provide commentary and examples of commissions which provide sufficient examples to cover all expected competencies required, your organisations delivered from the framework, detailing (weighting 40 %)
  
  Contracting Authority
  
  Budgeted value and programme
  
  Actual value and programme
  
  detail of technical input
  
  Risks identified and mitigated
  
  Innovation
  
  VfM provided
  
  Key successes
  
  lessons learned
  
  T3 Provide an overview of the organisation structure which delivered the framework commissions listed in T2, detailing (weighting 30 %)
  
  Organisation structure
  
  How this was structure against various lots
  
  Resource profile
  
  Experience
  
  Resource locations
  
  Likely Team Leader for each specialism's CVs and short bios
  
  Head office details and details of the office of the likely commission manager.
  
  II.2.10)Information about variants
  Variants will be accepted: no
  
  II.2.11)Information about options
  Options: no
  
  II.2.12)Information about electronic catalogues
  
  II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
  The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
  
  II.2.14)Additional information
  
  Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information
  
  III.1)Conditions for participation
  
  III.1.1)Suitability to pursue the professional activity, including requirements relating to enrolment on professional or trade registers
  
  III.1.2)Economic and financial standing
  Minimum level(s) of standards possibly required:
  
  Bidders should answer Q4B.1.1 And provide the turnover figures for the previous three years. If you are unable to provide this information then an explanation must be given at Question 4B.3
  
  Insurance levels required in section 1.80.11 are:
  
  Professional Liability Insurance in the sum of no less than 5 000 000 GBP,
  
  Public Liability Insurance in the sum of no less than 10 000 000 GBP,
  
  Product Liability Insurance in the sum of no less than 5 000 000 GBP and
  
  Employers' Liability Insurance in the sum of no less than 5 000 000 GBP at least.
  
  Bidders should provide details of their Environmental Management Standards.
  
  Bidders should provide details of their Environmental Management Standards.
  
  Bidders should provide details of their Quality Assurance Scheme.
  
  III.1.3)Technical and professional ability
  Selection criteria as stated in the procurement documents
  
  III.1.5)Information about reserved contracts
  
  III.2)Conditions related to the contract
  
  III.2.1)Information about a particular profession
  
  III.2.2)Contract performance conditions:
  
  III.2.3)Information about staff responsible for the performance of the contract
  
  Section IV: Procedure
  
  IV.1)Description
  
  IV.1.1)Type of procedure
  Restricted procedure
  
  IV.1.3)Information about a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system
  The procurement involves the establishment of a framework agreement
  
  Framework agreement with several operators
  
  Envisaged maximum number of participants to the framework agreement: 70
  
  IV.1.4)Information about reduction of the number of solutions or tenders during negotiation or dialogue
  
  IV.1.6)Information about electronic auction
  
  IV.1.8)Information about the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)
  The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement: yes
  
  IV.2)Administrative information
  
  IV.2.1)Previous publication concerning this procedure
  
  IV.2.2)Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate
  Date: 30/01/2017
  
  Local time: 10:00
  
  IV.2.3)Estimated date of dispatch of invitations to tender or to participate to selected candidates
  Date: 20/02/2017
  
  IV.2.4)Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted:
  English
  
  IV.2.6)Minimum time frame during which the tenderer must maintain the tender
  Duration in months: 120 (from the date stated for receipt of tender)
  
  IV.2.7)Conditions for opening of tenders
  
  Section VI: Complementary information
  
  VI.1)Information about recurrence
  This is a recurrent procurement: yes
  
  Estimated timing for further notices to be published:
  
  36 months.
  
  VI.2)Information about electronic workflows
  
  VI.3)Additional information:
  
  This ITT is a two stage process with all responses to be submitted via the Public contracts Scotland Tender website. All organisations must submit one response to the qualification envelope regardless of the number of lots being bid for. A technical envelope response must be submitted for each lot being bid for.
  
  The buyer is using PCS-Tender to conduct this PQQ exercise. The Project code is 6812. For more information see: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/info/InfoCentre.aspx?ID=2343
  
  The Contracting Authority does not intend to include a sub-contract clause in this contract for the following reason:
  
  Although the total framework value is estimated be greater than 4 000 000 GBP, it is not estimated that any individual commission will exceed 4 000 000 GBP.
  
  The Contracting Authority does not intend to include any community benefit requirements in this contract for the following reason:
  
  Community benefits will not be evaluated as part of this contract. However, all consultants wishing to participate provide details of their activity in the community and social responsibilities.
  
  (SC Ref:468467).
  
  VI.4)Procedures for review
  
  VI.4.1)Review body
  Strathclyde Partnership for Transport
  131 St Vincent Street
  Glasgow
  G2 5JF
  United Kingdom
  Telephone: +44 1413333556
  Fax: +44 1413333224
  Internet address:www.spt.co.uk
  
  VI.4.2)Body responsible for mediation procedures
  
  VI.4.3)Review procedure
  
  VI.4.4)Service from which information about the review procedure may be obtained
  
  VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
  08/12/2016
© European Union, http://ted.europa.eu

Gewährleistung

competitionline übernimmt keine Verantwortung für Fehler, Auslassungen, Unterbrechungen, Löschungen, Mängel oder Verzögerungen im Betrieb oder bei Übertragung von Inhalten. competitionline übernimmt keine Verantwortung für Einbußen oder Schäden, die aus der Verwendung der Internetseiten, aus der Verwendung von Nutzerinhalten oder von Inhalten Dritter, die aus den Internetseiten oder über den Service gepostet oder an Nutzer übertragen werden, oder aus Interaktionen zwischen Nutzer und Internetseiten (online oder offline) resultieren. Bitte lesen Sie hierzu unsere Nutzungsbedingungen.

INFO-BOX

Ausschreibung veröffentlicht	13.12.2016
Zuletzt aktualisiert	13.12.2016
Wettbewerbs-ID	2-250674	Status	Kostenpflichtig
Seitenaufrufe	46

Seitenanfang

Mitgliedschaften für Planungsbüros für Hochschulen für Institutionen für Hersteller für Bauherren	Services Newsletter abonnieren Büro eintragen Job schalten Ergebnis veröffentlichen Bauprojekt veröffentlichen Ausschreibung veröffentlichen Ausschreibung bewerben Mediadaten	Informationen Über uns Alle Rankings Der Ausschreibungsmonitor Kontakt	Rechtliches Nutzungsbedingungen Impressum Datenschutz Whistleblowing FAQ Cookie-Einstellungen
© competitionline Verlags GmbH
Wettbewerbe, Ausschreibungen und Stellenanzeigen
Für Architekten, Landschaftsarchitekten, Ingenieure und Studierende
Büroprofile erfolgreicher Ingenieur- und Architekturbüros
Alles online und täglich aktuell

Design Technical and Professional Services Framework

Projektdaten

Anzeigentext Ausschreibung

Gewährleistung

Sie haben keine Cookies aktiviert