modgnikehtotsyek
ALLE WETTBEWERBSERGEBNISSE, AUSSCHREIBUNGEN UND JOBS Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren

Offener Wettbewerb | 06/2022

Jan Vodňanský Elementary School in Prague (CZ)

main entrance

main entrance

Finalist

joyjoy studio

Architektur

EGKK Landschaftsarchitektur

Landschaftsarchitektur

AMPeng s.r.o.

Brandschutzplanung

Erläuterungstext

A new center is being built in the heart of Prague 7. Between trees, along a small park, the new JAN VODŇANSKÝ elementary school rises like a hill from the flat landscape. Open, friendly, and full of life it stands there! On all levels of the building, inside and outside, it offers the children a place to learn and to play. The outdoor classes on the roof, the sports areas and spacious terraces reflect the life inside the school and enliven the surroundings. All are welcome! It is not only a place of community for the children of the school but also for the children and residents of the neighborhood. In terms of urban planning, the building with its terraces, sports and green areas plays a special role in its neighborhood and is intended to form a new center for education and community.

Beurteilung durch das Preisgericht

The authors have already presented a very strong concept in the first round. The school building here does not aim to be a distinctive public element, but focuses on its overall playfulness and has a welcoming feel - the presented image of the school is “a building for children”. The ease of public access is one of the great strengths of the design. The jury also appreciates the very well thought out and accessible roofs which create a good counterbalance to the small site. There is a variety of good quality spaces in the design that are in close contact with the classrooms and a very good distribution of classrooms. The separate use of the ground floor and gymnasium - representing the two main public elements of the school – is also well designed. However, the overall architectural expression fell short of the jury's expectations. The jury also points to the use of a potentially valuable and attractive part of the ground floor for the kitchen. This edge of the building is treated as a rear façade and the design here falls short of its concept. The maintenance and upkeep of the building would, in the opinion of the jury, prove very costly.
poster 01

poster 01

poster 02

poster 02

poster 03

poster 03

poster 04

poster 04